How baby born against all odds will save his brother's life


Every child's birth is a miracle to their mum and dad.

But few arrivals are quite as miraculous as that of Samantha and David McDowell's baby Ethan - who will save the life of his brother Alex, four.

Alex suffers from a rare ­genetic blood disorder called Fanconi anaemia, which ­causes bone marrow failure.

The condition killed his sister Jessica, 11, three years ago and the only long-term cure is a bone-marrow or stem-cell ­transplant from a sibling or ­other compatible donor.

Samantha and David had battled with their local NHS trust for IVF to have a ­"designer baby" whose umbilical cord would provide stem cells to save Alex. Heartbreakingly, the IVF cycle failed. But then, against the odds, ­Samantha naturally conceived healthy Ethan - who was a perfect match for sick Alex.

Samantha, 42, says: "He truly is a miracle. The angels must have been watching over us when he was conceived. We would have brought Ethan into the world regardless of whether he had FA, but if he can save his brother then that will be the most amazing thing."

The McDowells had launched their campaign for IVF in 2009 with the hope of creating a so-called "saviour sibling". Doctors would screen embryos to find one without the faulty FA gene and create a child without the disease, who would also be a tissue match for Alex.

After the longed-for NHS-funded IVF cycle failed, the ­couple could not afford to try again and feared Alex would eventually die from his condition, which can cause cancer and bone marrow failure.

But then, as it seemed all hope was lost, fate intervened when, astonishingly, ­Samantha fell pregnant naturally.

Now four months old and free of FA, he has been confirmed as a perfect tissue match for Alex.

David, 39, says: "Alex adores his baby brother but he's too young to understand the ­implications of all this. Ethan will be responsible for saving his brother's life and, as parents, that's more than we could ever have wished for."

It is a long wished-for happy ending for the McDowells after five years of heartbreak.

Their daughter Jessica was nine when she was diagnosed with Fanconi anaemia in 2006. Tests revealed that her parents, who live in Malton, North ­Yorkshire, were both carriers of the gene, which means their children have a one in four chance of being born with it. Their eldest Ashleigh, 16, does not have the condition but was not a close enough match to be a donor for Jessica or Alex.

David says: "We'd never even heard of FA before Jessica was diagnosed. It is a very rare condition that only affects three in a million people ­worldwide.

"We quickly realised it was very, very serious. Jess would die if she didn't have a bone marrow transplant. The best option would have been a 100 per cent tissue match from a sibling, but obviously we didn't have that option, so they had to use a 50 per cent match from me."

Jessica's transplant went ahead in May 2008 but tragically she died three months later from multiple organ failure after suffering ­complications. To add to the heartbreak, Samantha had found out a year earlier, when she was six months pregnant with Alex, that he had FA, too.

She says: "It was heartbreaking. Obviously we'd been here before and seen the pain and suffering it caused. But there was no way I could terminate my pregnancy. Despite her illness, Jess was the happiest little girl and we were lucky enough to spend 11 wonderful years with her. We knew we had to give our little boy a chance at life too. I'm just so glad Jess got a chance to meet her little brother before she passed away."

Desperate to help save Alex, the McDowells' only hope seemed to be a so-called "saviour sibling" for Alex. But they stumbled at the first hurdle when they found they were the victims of a cruel IVF postcode lottery.

Samantha says: "We fought our NHS trust for a year before they agreed to fund the IVF ­treatment. Even then, they only agreed to do one cycle. We felt really let down as, according to NHS guidelines, we should have been eligible for three cycles, but by that point I was ­approaching 40 and fell outside the age restrictions.

"But I wasn't doing this because I had poor fertility - we had to have screening as it was simply the only way we could guarantee our baby wouldn't have FA."

In March last year Samantha underwent the £6,000 treatment. She and David were ­devastated when it failed, fearing they had lost their only chance to save Alex. She says: "We desperately wanted ­another baby anyway, not simply as a 'saviour ­sibling', which is a term I don't like as it suggests they're only useful for one thing, but it wasn't to be. I suffer from severe ­arthritis and David is my full-time carer so unfortunately we were in no position to pay for IVF privately. The doctors had implied I was too old to get pregnant without it ­anyway, so we just tried to accept it and move on."

It was then that fate ­intervened. Four months later, last July, Samantha was shocked to find out she was pregnant.

She says: "When I saw the pregnancy test I couldn't ­believe it. It was so ­unexpected. I was partly thrilled and ­partly terrified. After all, IVF would have screened for the gene, but having conceived ­naturally, there was a one-in-four chance this baby would have FA. We tried to be ­optimistic but it was very hard having already seen two of our children suffer so much."

The couple took the difficult decision to not test for the condition during pregnancy.

Samantha says: "I wouldn't blame any parent for testing and subsequently choosing a ­termination but in our case it's not something we could go through with.

"That's why it upsets us when people said we just wanted a baby so he could be a saviour sibling. In fact, he was a much-longed-for child and we were going to give him a chance at life regardless of the outcome."

Thankfully, early scans showed the baby was developing normally - a small or underdeveloped foetus is often a tell-tale sign of FA. Samantha gave birth to Ethan by caesarean section in April, then had to wait an agonising eight weeks before doctors confirmed he did not have FA.

Samantha says: "I cried with ­happiness when we heard the news. It was such a relief. Ethan has since undergone tests and was found to be a perfect match for his brother. It's more than we could ever have hoped for.

"It's a double miracle as our baby could have been free of the disease but not a match. What is heartbreaking is that Ethan would also have been a match for Jessica were she still here, as tests have shown Alex and Jessica have ­exactly the same genetic fingerprint."

The couple hope Alex will be well enough for a bone-marrow transplant in the next few months, using stem cells from his brother's umbilical cord. And although Ethan is an "accidental" saviour sibling, his parents support families who use IVF for genetic screening.

David - who is studying a degree in molecular sciences in the hope of ­working in genetic research into FA - says: "We were very lucky Ethan wasn't born with FA. But IVF is the only way of making sure it doesn't happen.

"I know genetic screening is often controversial but how many parents could say they wouldn't do the same thing if they were in our shoes?

"A lot of people mistakenly believe the child's life will be dictated by his sick sibling and he'll spend his whole life being poked and prodded and cut up to provide 'spare parts'. But that couldn't be further from the truth.

"Ethan can save Alex using stem cells from his umbilical cord which otherwise would have been discarded. The doctors don't need to touch him at all. He's going to save his brother's life but he's blissfully unaware of it."

Samantha adds: "Thanks to Ethan, Alex is hopefully going to grow up to be a healthy and happy little boy, and when Ethan is old enough we're going to tell him how he saved his brother's life. We love him to bits - he truly is our little miracle."

 DAVID and Samantha have set up a charity, Fanconi Anaemia Family Support. To donate visit www.fanconisupport.info

Via Mirror

NEMO Google Group

| | TrackBacks (0)
Google Groups
NEMO
Visit this group


Google Groups
Subscribe to NEMO
Email:
Visit this group

A 10-year-old girl with a deadly blood clot underwent a life-saving surgery that showed the power of using stem cells to regenerate healthy organs.

The girl developed a clot in the blood vessel between her intestine and liver during her first year of life, creating the risk of potentially fatal bleeding. Michael Olausson, a surgeon atSahlgrenska University Hospital at the University of Gothenburg took a blood vessel from a donor, chemically removed tissue and DNA from it, then seeded stem cells from the girl's bone marrow to create a healthy, living blood vessel.

"We carried out the surgery over three months ago now, and the result was very good, with no serious complications," Olausson, of the hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden, said today in a statement. "The girl is in good health, and we believe that her prognosis is very good. Since the vessel was created with the girl's own stem cells, she does not need to take drugs to prevent rejection."

A similar procedure was used in 2008 by surgeons in Barcelona to create a new windpipe for a 30-year-old woman whose airway collapsed from a tuberculosis infection.

More research may lead to the ability to remake other organs and arteries, Olausson said. This might help patients who need kidney dialysis or surgery on arteries leading to their heart, Olausson said.

While blood vessels from other parts of a patient's body are sometimes used to repair such defects, liver failure can result if the vessels are inadequate, according to the hospital's statement.

To contact the reporter on this story: Rob Waters in San Francisco at rwaters5@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Reg Gale at rgale5@bloomberg.net.

A SERIOUSLY-ill child whose parents had a "designer baby" in a bid to cure him has completely recovered, his parents said today.

Charlie Whitaker was born with Diamond Blackfan Anaemia (DBA), a rare condition which prevented his body from making red blood cells, The (London) Daily Telegraph saidd.

His parents, Jayson and Michelle, were told the only cure for their son was a stem cell transplant.

With no family member a genetic match for Charlie, the couple from Palterton, northern England, flew to the US for IVF and to select an embryo. The controversial practice was banned in Britain at the time, although it is now permitted.

Stem cells transplanted from the umbilical cord of his brother Jamie - who was born in 2003 - have now completely cured him.

Charlie, aged 12, can now live a normal, healthy life after years of painful blood transfusions and daily injections, his parents said.

"I really like the term saviour baby because that is what he is.""People would use the term designer or harvest baby to talk about Jamie, to make it sound like he was born for spare parts, but that is completely wrong," Michelle Whitaker said.

Link

Transcript of first newspaper interview in Boston

BOSTON METRO
Boston's largest circulation dialy newspaper
Wednesday, Frebruary 12, 2003 . Volume 2 . issue 197 . 

HELLO THERE

Andres Trevino
Parent

Your son was born with Primary Immune Deficiency. Could you explain this illness?
P.I.D. is a disorder of the immune system that affects 10 million people worldwide. It can be chronic and very severe and strikes males and females of all ages, although it frequently presents itself early on in life. The lack of unique symproms causes it to resemble many other illnesses. It is often confused with AIDS, but P.I.D. is genetic. Andy has Ectodermal dysplasia with immune deficiency, which causes repeated infections of his gut, lungs, blood and skin, as well as refractory diarrhea.

What have you done to help him?

The most important thing is to be with Andy by his side, always. His infections are constant. I decided to build a Web site in November 2000, to inform the pubilc about his condition. The Web site has successfully contributed to raising public awareness of the disease. Ir raises funds for research and provides advice for parents with children in the hospital. THe funds from the Web site go to the Department of Immunology at Children's Hospital. We spent lots of time at the hospital battling infections and we didn's have a diagnosis. So I published Andy's medical records, and some doctors in Houston replied with a second opinion and advice on possible treatment.

Did you have tech experience?

I knew how to use a computer. I purchased Microsoft Front Page, off the shelf. It is so easy. I can build pages by Andy's crib at the hospital.

How can people help?

Andy is currently waiting for a bone marrow transplant. To help and learn more, go to the Web site www.andy.org.mx, leave a commento for Andy, or purchase merchandise at "The Store". Also you can call (617) 962 6016 or e-mail andy@andy.org.mx
 

Marcy Raymond

Source

Stem cell injection 'reverses glaucoma'

People with glaucoma could receive a simple injection in the near future to halt - or even reverse - the eye condition.

Scientists at Cambridge University believe the technique, which uses stem cells, could even cure blindness one day.

They have already had success in rats and hope to start trials in humans within five years.

The method involves taking stem cells from bone marrow and injecting them in a solution into the back of the eye.

There, they help existing optic nerve cells from degenerating further. They can also transform theselves into new optic nerve cells, reversing damage and improving eyesight.

Professor Keith Martin, a neuroscientist at Cambridge University and an eye surgeon at Addenbrooke's Hospital, said: "Finding treatments to reverse blindness is no longer in the realm of science fiction.

"We are doing it in animal models and results are so encouraging that we hope to move forward to testing on humans soon.

"Stem cell treatment is moving forward very fast in many branches of the medicine and we are seeing some of the best results in eyes."

He added: "We have concentrated on glaucoma because it is so common, but there are quite a few diseases that affect they optic nerve, such as inflammatory diseases, so it could be used here too."

While the team has had success in halting glaucoma in rats and reversing its decline to some extent, they are still working on the ultimate objective - how to cure blindness.

There are 300,000 people in Britain diagnosed with glaucoma, although the total number of sufferers is thought to be double that. Most are over 40.

The condition is usually caused by raised eye pressure and damage to the optic nerve, which transmits signals from the retina to the brain. The field of vision slowly narrows over years or decades.

Prof Martin said the new technique could help two groups in particular: those diagnosed with advanced glaucoma and those who developed it early in life.

The existing treatment, lowering eye pressure, worked well for most people but as it was a preventative strategy it was useless for those with advanced glaucoma, he said. In addition, lowering eye pressure alone could not stave off glaucoma over many decades.

The project is funded by a £320,000 grant from charity Fight for Sight, which is supporting today's (SAT) World Glaucoma Day.

Dr Dolores Conroy, research officer for Fight for Sight, said: "Advances in stem cell technology are likely to revolutionise treatments for diseases like glaucoma.

"We must invest in this research field now so treatments to save, and potentially restore, the sight of millions of people are available in the future."

Source


ETHICS | 08.03.2011

German Ethics Council votes in favor of test-tube embryo screening

 

Genetic screening of test-tube embryos has been the subject of hot debate for months in Germany. The German Ethics Council has narrowly voted in favor of allowing the test a week before parliament debates imposing a ban.

 

The German Ethics Council on Tuesday voted in favor of allowing doctors to screen test-tube embryos for genetic defects, before parliament debates proposed legislation on the matter next week.

The Council, which serves to make independent recommendations to the German parliament and government, narrowly voted to recommend that parliament allow pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in cases where potential parents are predispositioned to miscarry or pass along serious genetic disorders.

Of the Council's 26 members - composed of doctors, scientists, lawyers, philosophers, and theologians - 13 voted for limited use of PGD. Eleven members voted against it.

PGD has been the subject of hot debate in Germany since June of last year, when the Federal Court of Justice ruled that the formerly illegal practice should be allowed in some cases. Concerned that PGD could be a first step towards eugenics, many conservative politicians, including Chancellor Angela Merkel, have called for a ban.

A pregnant woman undergoing ultrasoundConservative politicians say women should wait until they are pregnant for fetal genetic screening

Ethics Council Vice-Chair and Catholic theologian Eberhard Schockenhoff expressed surprise at the council's vote, after nearly two-thirds of the Council advocated allowing genetic screening in 2003 - and with much less strict limitations.

A 'historic first'

In its nearly 110-page review of the issue, the Council expressed concern that the abuse of PGD could lead "for the first time in reproductive history to genetic selection from several embryos before the establishment of a pregnancy."

Council member and Protestant bishop Wolfgang Huber said he objected to PGD because it could pose the possibility of "discarding a human life due to undesired traits."

However, the Council's 13 advocates of PGD said that in cases of serious genetic defects it was more morally acceptable to terminate artificially inseminated embryos outside the uterus than to have potential mothers abort implanted fetuses. Abortion remains a legal option in Germany for potential mothers of children with genetic disorders.

The Council's genetic-screening advocates stressed that the procedure should only be used in cases where the prospective parents carried a strong risk of passing on hereditary disorders that could lead to grave illness or disability.

Church condemns PGD

Bishop HuberHuber said PGD threatened human dignity and the right to life

The German Bishops' Conference came out against the Council's vote Tuesday, with Bishop Anton Losinger saying pre-implantation screening was a "massive violation of the word and spirit of Germany's Basic Law and embryo protection law."

"What's being achieved here is an ethical breach, because the human embryo is an embryonic human from the moment when egg and sperm come together," Losinger said.

Germany's Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger meanwhile welcomed the Ethic Council's decision, adding that the Council's division over the matter represented the need for an "open discussion [in parliament] without pressure to toe party lines."

The justice minister herself came out in favor of pre-implantation screening under defined circumstances: "Especially couples with high genetic risk factors need a way to fulfill their desire for children together."

Parliamentary debate

Next week, Germany's parliament is set to read three pieces of proposed legislation on PGD: One out-and-out ban and two proposals to allow screening under certain circumstances.

The ban proposal, supported by a group of parliamentarians including former Health Minister Ulla Schmidt, claims that PGD threatens human dignity, as well as the right to life and gender equality. They argue that it is not up to humans to decide which life may come into existence and which may not.

Angela MerkelMerkel favors a ban on PGD

A second proposal, put forth by Christian Democrat Peter Hintze and Free Democrat Ulrike Flach, would allow the use of PGD in cases where potential parents are aware of hereditary risks or where there is the threat of stillbirths or miscarriages. Hintze and Flach claim PGD to be a more humane alternative to tests on fetuses and abortion.

The third bill, drafted by a group including Bundestag President Norbert Lammert, would allow PGD in cases of hereditary risks or potential pregnancy complications - but only as determined on a case-by-case basis by an ethics commission.

Author: David Levitz (AFP, KNA, dpa)

Editor: Rob Turner

Making a book

| | TrackBacks (0)

Bébé du double espoir

| | TrackBacks (0)

France's First Baby Born To Treat Siblings With Genetic Disorder

Umut Talha's name means "our hope" in Turkish, and his birth brought some much needed good fortune into the lives of his siblings. The infant, born January 26th of this year, is France's first reported case of a child being conceived with in vitro fertilization and genetic screening to ensure it could serve as a viable stem cell donor. Umut's older two siblings suffer from beta-thalassemia, an inheritable blood disorder that requires its victims to undergo regular blood transfusions. Using preimplantation genetic diagnosis, doctors at Antoine Beclere Hospital were able to select Umut from one of twelve fertilized embryos such that he would not have beta-thalassemia and so his umbilical cord blood might treat one or more of his siblings. His sister, aged two, is set to receive cells from his cord blood in the next few months. You can meet Umut and his family in the video below. While his birth is undoubtedly good news for he and his siblings, his arrival has raised more questions about the ethics of genetic selection among embryos. Is Umut simply a well planned addition to a needy family, or is he a sign of more nefarious designer babies to come?

Doctors at Antoine Beclere have named Umut a 'double-hope' baby because his conception was designed to grant both him, and another child a healthy life. In the French press, 'medical baby' is the term most used, with 'savior sibling' popular in English. The concept of genetically screening embryos to guarantee donor status isn't new - it first found success in the US at the turn of this century. Yet Umut Talha arrives at a time when France is reopening debate on bioethical questions like the ones raised by his birth. After all, if you can screen your embryos to select the one that is the best donor for your other children, why shouldn't you be allowed to screen for other genetic traits?

Watch from 0:52 to 3:07 in the following video to see clips of Umut Talha with his family, and the press conferences surrounding his birth. The discussion that follows it probably isn't worth your time.


News of Umut's conception has engendered the expected reactions from various parts of the political spectrum. Catholic bishops in France have condemned the action, for instance. However, bioethics surrounding this use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and in vitro fertilization are hardly clear cut. After all, IVF is a (relatively) common conception technique used by thousands of couples every year, and PGD is primarily aimed at lowering instances of deadly or painful genetic disorders. Are we concerned that Umut was screened to ensure that he would have a life free of suffering from beta-thalassemia, that he was selected to help save someone's life, or both?

In the end, it may not matter which concerns us most. Cases like Umut are just one example of how genetic testing could affect reproduction at all stages of pregnancy. We've seen howprenatal parental genetic screening can be used to reduce instances of recessive genetic disorders. Some pioneering couples are even getting their childrens' entire genome sequenced many years after birth. There are benefits to these applications of genetic testing that can be as useful (in some cases) as PGD and IVF.

Where there are benefits humans are sure to explore. The only question is whether or not the innovators of embryonic genetic screening will have to do it clandestinely. If cases like Umut encourage France and other nations to permit some measured forms of genetic intervention to help save lives, then we'll likely see these small seeds of the technology slowly blossom into more complete forms of genetic screening in the years ahead. If, instead, ethical concerns lead us to outlaw such practices then parents will pursue them in other countries. Themedical tourism industry is always looking for more patients.

The bottomline is that parents will do almost anything to help their children. If that means having another child, or undergoing ethically complex procedures, they'll do it. If it means breaking the law, or traveling to somewhere that has a different law, they'll do that too. Umut Talha is certainly a 'double hope' for his family, but he's also a promise to the world. Just like the other 'savior siblings' that have come before him, he heralds a day when parents everywhere will have the power to shape their children from their genetics up.


Source

Powered by Movable Type 4.0